Thursday 3 November 2022

Why is manual testing important in the world of automation?

Automation testing is known for the speed of execution and for providing accurate details. Certain repeatable testing tasks can be easily and efficiently performed by the platform of test automation. However, there are still certain aspects of software testing that cannot be tackled and solved by the automation testing platform and hence manual testing would be an appropriate solution. In this article, you will get to know the importance of manual testing in the world of automation. 

Following are the key reasons that depict the strategic significance of manual testing over automation testing:

1. Unexpected bugs: The software code can be tested by automation tools only according to pre-written scripts. But, there might be instances where crucial bugs may crop up in the unexpected parts of the software. To solve this issue, manual testing can be used for detecting potential defects in the software.


2. Manual testing is a feasible and cost-effective solution for smaller projects: When test automation is used for QA processes in an organization that are small or are start-ups, then it might become a big deal. This is because professional software, management, maintenance and scriptwriting can absorb a huge part of the development budget. 

The test scripts need to be created by QA testers so that automation tools can be properly set up to run the tests properly. On the contrary, a small feature can be effectively checked by the manual testing method and thus the tester can provide the feedback to the developers at the earliest.


3. Some aspects of software testing cannot be carried out by automation tools: Even if no bugs have been detected by the test automation method, usability and design defects can be easily identified by the manual testing method. The most advanced automated test scripts cannot detect certain aspects of software testing, which can only be detected by using manual testing.


4. Exploratory testing requires manual intervention: Specific actions that have been instructed by the team can be carried out by automated tests flawlessly. Writing automated tests require adequate planning and preparation, which in turn sets certain restrictions for testing. These restrictions mean there is no deviation from the written test in order to explore the application. Exploratory testing or ad-hoc testing is carried out throughout the testing process as and when required and because there are no set boundaries, manual testing is implemented.   


5. Certain test scenarios cannot be automated: For example, there is an iPad application that is dependent on tap gestures. If the “tap” is automated, then it will not only prove to be costly but may also be not accurate when compared to touching the user interface with a finger. Certain features need to be tested manually for apt usage. Till the time a resource has been found to write an automated test, a manual test will easily fix those bugs. 


6. Errors in automation scripts: As errors are found in the code, similar glitches or errors can also be found in test automation scripts. This shows that test automation can report false positives and false negatives. When there is human involvement throughout the test procedure, then these bugs can be avoided. 

A manually entered script is generally used for automation activities. The wrong automated script can be observed as the functionality that failed in the worst situation, in the app or a scenario wherein a bug in the code has been passed as the right functionality. When manual testing is performed on a code, there is a sort of assurance that an application has been fully tested from a user’s opinion with no room for errors or faults.  


Conclusion: If you are looking forward to implementing manual testing or automation testing or both for your specific project, then do get connected with a leading software testing services company that will provide you with a viable testing strategy that is in line with your project specific requirements. 

About the author: I am a technical content writer focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies.


No comments:

Post a Comment